| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700K vs i5-11400F


Description
The i7-7700K is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700K gets a score of 289.8 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.7 times faster than the i7-7700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0671
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2016
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.9k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.82k points
495.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.44k
31.66k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
26.91k
26.21k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.25k
11.96k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.3k
18.5k (x1.39)
TOTAL
76.9k
88.34k (x1.15)

Multithread

i7-7700K

i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
127.73k
210.36k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
123.68k
203.84k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
72.05k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.08k
9.4k (x1.04)
TOTAL
289.82k
495.65k (x1.71)

Performance/W
i7-7700K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1345 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1302 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
309 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
3051 points/W
7625 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6765 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5981 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1388 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2955 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
17089 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4