Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 5 3600X
Description
The i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3600X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 257.5 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.5 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 257.5 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.5 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
870f10
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
September 2016
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.33k points
69.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.52k points
376.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.7k
16.21k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23.7k
22.99k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.46k
8.76k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.48k
21.94k (x1.91)
TOTAL
67.33k
69.9k (x1.04)
Multithread
i7-7700
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
115.97k
121.94k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
153.22k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.28k
67.74k (x2.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
33.31k (x4.86)
TOTAL
257.52k
376.22k (x1.46)
Performance/W
i7-7700
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1784 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1668 points/W
1613 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
105 points/W
351 points/W
TOTAL
3962 points/W
3960 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6356 points/GHz
3685 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5643 points/GHz
5225 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2733 points/GHz
4986 points/GHz
TOTAL
16032 points/GHz
15887 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4