| | | | | | |

Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
800f11
Core
Skylake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2015
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.18k
3.95k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
13.02k
18.36k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.17k
5.39k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
17.35k (x2.5)
TOTAL
27.3k
45.06k (x1.65)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.26k
19.47k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
62.23k
77.19k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.34k
15.4k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
12.25k (x2.24)
TOTAL
101.29k
124.3k (x1.23)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
14.63k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
24.09k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
5.51k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
15.86k (x2.58)
TOTAL
50.1k
60.09k (x1.2)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
48.75k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
80.1k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
24.5k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
19.85k (x3.15)
TOTAL
205.89k
173.2k (x0.84)

Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4