Core i7-4790 vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The i7-4790 is based on Haswell architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790 gets a score of 173.9 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790 gets a score of 173.9 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a40f41
Core
Haswell
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
84 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
44.73k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.89k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.19k
21.04k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
12.45k
22.41k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
10.21k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
24.27k (x4.88)
TOTAL
44.73k
77.93k (x1.74)
Multithread
i7-4790
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
87.14k
158.65k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
58k
215.86k (x3.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.75k
89.45k (x3.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
14.77k (x2.46)
TOTAL
173.89k
478.73k (x2.75)
Performance/W
i7-4790
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1037 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
691 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
2070 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4790
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5547 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1279 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4