| | | | | | |

Core i7-4790 vs Ryzen 5 3500X


Description
The i7-4790 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790 gets a score of 173.9 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500X is 2.1 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
870f10
Core
Haswell
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
May 2014
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.73k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.89k points
373.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.19k
15.48k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
12.45k
22.91k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
7.1k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
21.11k (x4.24)
TOTAL
44.73k
66.61k (x1.49)

Multithread

i7-4790

3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
87.14k
90.39k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
58k
139.1k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.75k
53.2k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
90.92k (x15.16)
TOTAL
173.89k
373.61k (x2.15)

Performance/W
i7-4790
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
1037 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
691 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
2070 points/W
5748 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4790
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
5547 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1279 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4