Core i7-3770K vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i7-3770K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770K gets a score of 97.4 k points while the 1600X gets 124.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770K gets a score of 97.4 k points while the 1600X gets 124.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
800f11
Core
Ivy Bridge
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
77 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x62+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2012
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.19k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
133.88k points
173.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-3770K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.86k
3.95k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
10.79k
18.36k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
5.39k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
17.35k (x3.15)
TOTAL
25.06k
45.06k (x1.8)
Multithread
i7-3770K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
19.47k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
46.25k
77.19k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.67k
15.4k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.36k
12.25k (x1.18)
TOTAL
97.44k
124.3k (x1.28)
Performance/W
i7-3770K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
223 points/W
205 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
601 points/W
813 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
1265 points/W
1308 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3770K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
990 points/GHz
988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2768 points/GHz
4591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1256 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1412 points/GHz
4338 points/GHz
TOTAL
6426 points/GHz
11265 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4