Core i7-10870H vs i7-4770
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4770 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-4770 gets 184 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2.6 times faster than the i7-4770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-4770 gets 184 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2.6 times faster than the i7-4770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
Jun 2013
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
16136
13615 (-15.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
24736
12545 (-49.28%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5984
5173 (-13.55%)
Test#1 (Memory)
12696
4671 (-63.21%)
TOTAL
59551
36005 (-39.54%)
Multithread
i7-10870H
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
117028
56169 (-52.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
199876
59537 (-70.21%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50641
23909 (-52.79%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8229
8206 (-0.28%)
TOTAL
375774
147820 (-60.66%)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
30376
23020 (-24.22%)
Test#2 (FP)
27947
11892 (-57.45%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6510
5292 (-18.72%)
Test#1 (Memory)
14366
4983 (-65.32%)
TOTAL
79200
45186 (-42.95%)
Multithread
i7-10870H
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
216184
94233 (-56.41%)
Test#2 (FP)
210824
59022 (-72.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51574
25058 (-51.41%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8465
5689 (-32.80%)
TOTAL
487048
184002 (-62.22%)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1122 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
703 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
2191 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
5902 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
11586 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9