| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.5 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
13.95k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
22.02k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
5.17k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
16.61k (x1.31)
TOTAL
59.55k
57.75k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-10870H

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
120.59k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
197.34k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
56.83k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
6.41k (x0.78)
TOTAL
375.77k
381.16k (x1.01)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
12.65k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
20.95k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
4.63k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
14.47k (x1.01)
TOTAL
79.2k
52.69k (x0.67)

Multithread

i7-10870H

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
101.78k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
177.57k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
47.18k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
6.78k (x0.8)
TOTAL
487.05k
333.31k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4