| | | |

Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 375.8 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2017

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
16136
13951 (-13.54%)
Test#2 (FP)
24736
22024 (-10.96%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5984
5167 (-13.65%)
Test#1 (Memory)
12696
16611 (30.84%)
TOTAL
59551
57753 (-3.02%)

Multithread

i7-10870H

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
117028
120586 (3.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
199876
197339 (-1.27%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50641
56829 (12.22%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8229
6405 (-22.16%)
TOTAL
375774
381159 (1.43%)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
2601 points/W
1855 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4442 points/W
3036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1125 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
183 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
8351 points/W
5864 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3227 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/GHz
5952 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1197 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2539 points/GHz
4490 points/GHz
TOTAL
11910 points/GHz
15609 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9