| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
50654
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
11264 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
3k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
12.29k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
3.64k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
6.55k (x0.62)
TOTAL
34.35k
25.46k (x0.74)

Multithread

i5-9500T

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
20.42k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
95.83k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
30.88k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
9.7k (x2.36)
TOTAL
133.63k
156.83k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
18.78k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
16.25k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
3.99k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
6.8k (x0.63)
TOTAL
61.46k
45.82k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-9500T

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
133.55k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
108.43k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
30.02k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
9.48k (x2.33)
TOTAL
274.02k
281.48k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4