Core i5-9500T vs Xeon X5670
Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 207.1 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.8 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 207.1 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.8 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
206c2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/6
6 /6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
8.35k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
5.58k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
3.32k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
3k (x0.29)
TOTAL
45.98k
20.26k (x0.44)
Multithread
i5-9500T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
49.72k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
35.19k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
21.88k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
8.6k (x2.15)
TOTAL
207.08k
115.4k (x0.56)
Performance/W
i5-9500T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
2139 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3025 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
638 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
5917 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3352 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4974 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2834 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
12427 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4