Core i5-9500T vs Xeon E3-1270 v2
Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 211.7 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.5 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 211.7 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.5 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
306a9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-H2
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/6
4 /8
TDP
35 W
69 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
36.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
139.38k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
13.16k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
12.51k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
5.62k (x0.55)
TOTAL
48.64k
36.29k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-9500T
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
51.89k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
57.35k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
23.74k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
6.4k (x1.55)
TOTAL
211.7k
139.38k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i5-9500T
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2133 points/W
752 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3167 points/W
831 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
631 points/W
344 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
6049 points/W
2020 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
3374 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5462 points/GHz
3207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2771 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
13145 points/GHz
9304 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4