| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs i3-10105


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
253.93k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
4.5k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
18.39k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
5.78k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
8.3k (x0.78)
TOTAL
34.35k
36.97k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
16.13k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
75.62k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
27.88k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
3.57k (x0.87)
TOTAL
133.63k
123.2k (x0.92)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
16.19k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
23.07k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
6.04k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
8.46k (x0.81)
TOTAL
45.98k
53.77k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
57.59k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
100.63k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
28.59k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
3.56k (x0.89)
TOTAL
207.08k
190.38k (x0.92)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
16.11k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
24.12k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.71k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
7.89k (x0.77)
TOTAL
48.64k
53.83k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
58.25k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
105.73k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
27.8k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
3.51k (x0.85)
TOTAL
211.7k
195.29k (x0.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
28.9k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
25.85k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
5.88k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
8.29k (x0.77)
TOTAL
61.46k
68.92k (x1.12)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
111.69k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
110.23k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
28.45k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
3.56k (x0.87)
TOTAL
274.02k
253.93k (x0.93)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4