| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
3.41k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
15.96k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
4.69k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
17.42k (x1.64)
TOTAL
34.35k
41.47k (x1.21)

Multithread

i5-9500T

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
20.88k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
110.37k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
39.25k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
6.66k (x1.62)
TOTAL
133.63k
177.16k (x1.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
13.76k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
23.03k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
5.12k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
15.23k (x1.42)
TOTAL
61.46k
57.13k (x0.93)

Multithread

i5-9500T

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
83.23k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
161.06k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
40.52k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
6.73k (x1.65)
TOTAL
274.02k
291.53k (x1.06)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4