| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs FX 6300


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 6300 is based on Piledriver.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 211.7 k points while the 6300 gets 66.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 3.2 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
600f20
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Vishera
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
23.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
66.43k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
7.71k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
7.41k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
2.81k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
5.2k (x0.51)
TOTAL
48.64k
23.14k (x0.48)

Multithread

i5-9500T

6300
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
25.2k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
25.83k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
11.47k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
3.92k (x0.95)
TOTAL
211.7k
66.43k (x0.31)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
2133 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3167 points/W
272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
631 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
6049 points/W
699 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5462 points/GHz
1951 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2771 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
13145 points/GHz
6088 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4