| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs i5-12500H


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
906a3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/6
12/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
18432 kB
Date
July 2019
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
225.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
6.93k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
18.76k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
9.46k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
8.17k (x0.77)
TOTAL
34.35k
43.33k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
18.04k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
66.78k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
37.55k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
6.08k (x1.48)
TOTAL
133.63k
128.45k (x0.96)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
21.93k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
18.79k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
10.5k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
8.11k (x0.77)
TOTAL
45.98k
59.33k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
61.07k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
86.08k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
41.08k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
6.02k (x1.5)
TOTAL
207.08k
194.25k (x0.94)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
21.11k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
19.61k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
9.53k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
7.72k (x0.75)
TOTAL
48.64k
57.97k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
61.44k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
93.66k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
40.09k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
6.01k (x1.46)
TOTAL
211.7k
201.2k (x0.95)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
22.61k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
17.73k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
9.63k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
8.4k (x0.78)
TOTAL
61.46k
58.37k (x0.95)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
85.49k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
94.93k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
39.15k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
6.08k (x1.49)
TOTAL
274.02k
225.65k (x0.82)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4