| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs i3-1215U


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 274 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.5 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
906a4
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
10240 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
185.6k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500T
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.73k
6.95k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
15.41k
16.28k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
10.49k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
9.95k (x0.94)
TOTAL
34.35k
43.67k (x1.27)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.82k
14.97k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
85.48k
51.01k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.21k
30.47k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
8.59k (x2.09)
TOTAL
133.63k
105.05k (x0.79)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
20.87k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
20.74k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
11.32k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
8.32k (x0.79)
TOTAL
45.98k
61.26k (x1.33)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
45.12k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
60.59k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
28.48k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
14.06k (x3.51)
TOTAL
207.08k
148.26k (x0.72)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
15.63k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
20.2k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
9.94k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
8.06k (x0.79)
TOTAL
48.64k
53.83k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
35.72k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
56.41k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
25k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
12.48k (x3.03)
TOTAL
211.7k
129.6k (x0.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9500T
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
37.56k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
21.41k
21.13k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.82k
11.35k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
10.31k (x0.96)
TOTAL
61.46k
80.34k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-9500T

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
134.63k
73.97k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
113.61k
72.37k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.71k
29.61k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
9.65k (x2.37)
TOTAL
274.02k
185.6k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3846 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3246 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
620 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
7829 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5786 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2901 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
16610 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4