Core i5-8350U vs i3-4030U
Description
The i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8350U gets a score of 112.1 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 2.4 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8350U gets a score of 112.1 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 2.4 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
40651
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2017
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
38.31k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.12k points
46.09k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8350U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.74k
10.69k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
14.66k
6.16k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
2.49k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
2.23k (x0.54)
TOTAL
38.31k
21.57k (x0.56)
Multithread
i5-8350U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.05k
21.84k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
45.59k
15.86k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.69k
5.94k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
2.45k (x0.51)
TOTAL
112.12k
46.09k (x0.41)
Performance/W
i5-8350U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3403 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3039 points/W
1057 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
396 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
163 points/W
TOTAL
7475 points/W
3073 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8350U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
4650 points/GHz
5627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4071 points/GHz
3241 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
776 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
10642 points/GHz
11353 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4