| | | | | | |

Core i5-8265U vs i5-9500T


Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.9 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ea
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
August 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
274.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.68k
3.73k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
16.08k
15.41k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.62k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
10.59k (x1.33)
TOTAL
32.69k
34.35k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.29k
20.82k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
61.15k
85.48k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.53k
23.21k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
4.11k (x1.11)
TOTAL
95.69k
133.63k (x1.4)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
12.4k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
20.03k
18.41k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
4.69k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
10.48k (x1.49)
TOTAL
45.87k
45.98k (x1)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
51.42k
74.86k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
77.48k
105.88k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.65k
22.34k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
4.01k (x1.09)
TOTAL
149.24k
207.08k (x1.39)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
13.46k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
20.21k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
4.72k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
10.25k (x1.26)
TOTAL
47.94k
48.64k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
51.36k
74.65k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
79.72k
110.86k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.61k
22.08k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
4.12k (x1.1)
TOTAL
151.44k
211.7k (x1.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.19k
24.5k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
21.41k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
4.82k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
10.73k (x1.8)
TOTAL
46.67k
61.46k (x1.32)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
64.43k
134.63k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
61.91k
113.61k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.36k
21.71k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
4.07k (x1.16)
TOTAL
143.23k
274.02k (x1.91)

Performance/W
i5-8265U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4296 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4128 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
9548 points/W
7829 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4920 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4478 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1037 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
11966 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4