Core i5-8259U vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8259U gets a score of 229 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8259U gets a score of 229 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
54.55k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
229k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8259U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
21.06k
12.65k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
20.95k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.63k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
14.47k (x1.61)
TOTAL
54.55k
52.69k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-8259U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
96.43k
101.78k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
85.46k
177.57k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.31k
47.18k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.81k
6.78k (x0.27)
TOTAL
229k
333.31k (x1.46)
Performance/W
i5-8259U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3444 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3052 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
797 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
886 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
8179 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8259U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5543 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5208 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1241 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2363 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
14355 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4