| | | | | | |

Core i5-6400 vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i5-6400 is based on Skylake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6400 gets a score of 174.1 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-6400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
800f11
Core
Skylake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
48.05k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.05k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-6400
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
11.82k
13.95k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
22.02k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
5.17k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.95k
16.61k (x3.36)
TOTAL
39.56k
57.75k (x1.46)

Multithread

i5-6400

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
46.04k
120.59k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
69.47k
197.34k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.33k
56.83k (x3.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
6.41k (x0.83)
TOTAL
139.58k
381.16k (x2.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6400
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
21.1k
12.65k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
18.28k
20.95k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
4.63k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
14.47k (x3.25)
TOTAL
48.05k
52.69k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-6400

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
80.03k
101.78k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
177.57k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.19k
47.18k (x2.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.78k (x1.01)
TOTAL
174.05k
333.31k (x1.92)

Performance/W
i5-6400
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1231 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1094 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
2678 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6400
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6394 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5539 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1279 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1348 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
14560 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4