| | | | | | |

Core i5-5300U vs i3-4030U


Description
The i5-5300U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5300U is 1.7 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
40651
Core
Broadwell-U
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.71k points
46.09k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5300U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.2k
10.69k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
14.53k
6.16k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
2.49k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
2.23k (x0.71)
TOTAL
38.29k
21.57k (x0.56)

Multithread

i5-5300U

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.7k
21.84k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
15.86k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
5.94k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
2.45k (x0.68)
TOTAL
76.71k
46.09k (x0.6)

Performance/W
i5-5300U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2346 points/W
1057 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
616 points/W
396 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
163 points/W
TOTAL
5114 points/W
3073 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5300U
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
5931 points/GHz
5627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5011 points/GHz
3241 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1186 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1076 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
13204 points/GHz
11353 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4