Core i5-4200U vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i5-4200U is based on Haswell architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 3 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4200U gets a score of 57.8 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 3 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
800f11
Core
Haswell
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
June 2013
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
28.85k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
57.84k points
173.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4200U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.74k
14.63k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
7.75k
24.09k (x3.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.27k
5.51k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
15.86k (x5.14)
TOTAL
28.85k
60.09k (x2.08)
Multithread
i5-4200U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
27.66k
48.75k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
18.65k
80.1k (x4.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
24.5k (x3.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
19.85k (x4.56)
TOTAL
57.84k
173.2k (x2.99)
Performance/W
i5-4200U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1243 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
478 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
291 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
3856 points/W
1823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4200U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5669 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1260 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1187 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
11095 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4