Core i5-2500K vs i5-9500T
Description
The i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2500K gets a score of 111.8 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.9 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2500K gets a score of 111.8 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.9 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
906ea
Core
Sandy Bridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2011
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.85k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
111.83k points
274.02k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2500K
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.84k
13.46k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
10.43k
20.21k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
4.72k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.36k
10.25k (x1.91)
TOTAL
32.85k
48.64k (x1.48)
Multithread
i5-2500K
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
45.51k
74.65k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
40.83k
110.86k (x2.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.7k
22.08k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.79k
4.12k (x0.86)
TOTAL
111.83k
211.7k (x1.89)
Performance/W
i5-2500K
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
479 points/W
2133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
430 points/W
3167 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
218 points/W
631 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
1177 points/W
6049 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2500K
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2818 points/GHz
5462 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1449 points/GHz
2771 points/GHz
TOTAL
8878 points/GHz
13145 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4