| | | | | | |

Core i5-2300 vs Xeon E5472


Description
The i5-2300 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2300 gets a score of 52.9 k points while the E5472 gets 44.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2300 is 1.2 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
10676
Core
Sandy Bridge
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
May 2011
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
24.53k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.46k points
48.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2300
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.52k
2.29k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
7.01k
5.85k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
2.44k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.22k
4.81k (x1.14)
TOTAL
17.53k
15.39k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-2300

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
9.46k
9.06k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
26.25k
23.09k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.1k
9.7k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
2.53k (x0.81)
TOTAL
52.93k
44.38k (x0.84)

Performance/W
i5-2300
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
100 points/W
113 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
276 points/W
289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
148 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
557 points/W
555 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2300
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
813 points/GHz
763 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1361 points/GHz
1603 points/GHz
TOTAL
5654 points/GHz
5129 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4