| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
13.95k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
22.02k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
5.17k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
16.61k (x1.45)
TOTAL
51.82k
57.75k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-10500T

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
120.59k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
197.34k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
56.83k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
6.41k (x1.73)
TOTAL
233.94k
381.16k (x1.63)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
12.65k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
20.95k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.63k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
14.47k (x1.21)
TOTAL
64.6k
52.69k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-10500T

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
101.78k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
177.57k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
47.18k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
6.78k (x1.82)
TOTAL
302.13k
333.31k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4