| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i3-4030U


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 6.7 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
40651
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2014

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
2145 (-46.44%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
5396 (-61.98%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
2370 (-48.69%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
2015 (-81.73%)
TOTAL
33842
11925 (-64.76%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
3940 (-82.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
13676 (-85.84%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
5781 (-81.74%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
2439 (-0.51%)
TOTAL
153456
25836 (-83.16%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
6698 (-46.88%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
5985 (-66.64%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
2651 (-45.09%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
2133 (-80.27%)
TOTAL
46191
17467 (-62.19%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
14300 (-80.83%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
13830 (-88.44%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
6124 (-81.24%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
2484 (-1.43%)
TOTAL
229416
36738 (-83.99%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
6396 (-48.82%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
6199 (-67.46%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
2502 (-47.01%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
2048 (-80.11%)
TOTAL
46570
17145 (-63.18%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
12856 (-82.76%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
15116 (-88.09%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
5759 (-81.87%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
2146 (-14.06%)
TOTAL
235799
35877 (-84.78%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
10692 (-51.40%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
6158 (-69.17%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
2493 (-45.40%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
2228 (-80.30%)
TOTAL
57847
21571 (-62.71%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
21844 (-84.02%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
15860 (-88.27%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
5942 (-81.86%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
2447 (-1.28%)
TOTAL
307175
46093 (-84.99%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1057 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
396 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
163 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
3073 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
3241 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
11353 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9