| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Engineering Sample 506E8


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.5 times faster than the 506E8. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
506e8
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
Jun 2016

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
23913 (8.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
21030 (5.27%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
5047 (10.54%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
6398 (-43.41%)
TOTAL
57847
56388 (-2.52%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
95296 (-30.28%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
91944 (-32.02%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
22055 (-32.67%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
2301 (-7.15%)
TOTAL
307175
211596 (-31.12%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
INF points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
INF points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
INF points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
INF points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
INF points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6463 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5684 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1729 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
15240 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9