| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 3600X


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 3600X gets 398.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
16802 (-23.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
24259 (21.44%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
9217 (101.87%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
22747 (101.19%)
TOTAL
57847
73026 (26.24%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
126618 (-7.37%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
157100 (16.15%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
72122 (120.18%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
42688 (1,622.59%)
TOTAL
307175
398528 (29.74%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
759 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
449 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
4195 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
5170 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
16597 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9