Core i5-10210U vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
12.65k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
20.95k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
4.63k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
14.47k (x1.95)
TOTAL
55.86k
52.69k (x0.94)
Multithread
i5-10210U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
101.78k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
177.57k (x2.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
47.18k (x3.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
6.78k (x1.53)
TOTAL
145.51k
333.31k (x2.29)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4