Core i5-10210U vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
173.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
14.63k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
24.09k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
5.51k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
15.86k (x2.14)
TOTAL
55.86k
60.09k (x1.08)
Multithread
i5-10210U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
48.75k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
80.1k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
24.5k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
19.85k (x4.47)
TOTAL
145.51k
173.2k (x1.19)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
1823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4