Core i3-370M vs i3-4030U
Description
The i3-370M is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the i3-4030U gets 36.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 2 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-370M gets a score of 18.1 k points while the i3-4030U gets 36.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 2 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
40651
Core
Arrandale
Haswell
Base frecuency
0.933 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
8.49k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
18.15k points
46.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-370M
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.4k
6.7k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
2.35k
5.99k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.35k
2.65k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.39k
2.13k (x1.53)
TOTAL
8.49k
17.47k (x2.06)
Multithread
i3-370M
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.18k
14.3k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
5.13k
13.83k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.5k
6.12k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
2.48k (x1.07)
TOTAL
18.15k
36.74k (x2.02)
Performance/W
i3-370M
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
953 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
147 points/W
922 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
408 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
518 points/W
2449 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-370M
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1419 points/GHz
3525 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
978 points/GHz
3150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
561 points/GHz
1395 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
580 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
TOTAL
3537 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4