Core i3-4030U vs i5-8350U
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 2.4 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 2.4 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
806ea
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2014
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
38.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
112.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
16.74k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
14.66k (x2.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.79k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
4.12k (x1.85)
TOTAL
21.57k
38.31k (x1.78)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
51.05k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
45.59k (x2.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
10.69k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
4.78k (x1.95)
TOTAL
46.09k
112.12k (x2.43)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
3403 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
3039 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
7475 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
4650 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
4071 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
10642 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4