| | | | | | |

Core i3-4030U vs Celeron G1610T


Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 36.7 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.1 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
306a9
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2014
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
38.59k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4030U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.14k
2.34k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
6.54k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
3k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.01k
2.74k (x1.36)
TOTAL
11.93k
14.62k (x1.23)

Multithread

i3-4030U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.94k
4.67k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
13.68k
12.66k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.95k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.44k
2.53k (x1.04)
TOTAL
25.84k
25.8k (x1)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
7.87k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
7.14k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
3.04k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
2.79k (x1.31)
TOTAL
17.47k
20.84k (x1.19)

Multithread

i3-4030U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
15.12k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
14.05k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
5.94k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
3.48k (x1.4)
TOTAL
36.74k
38.59k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i3-4030U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
953 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
922 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
408 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
2449 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3525 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3150 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1395 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
9193 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4