Core i3-4030U vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.3 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.3 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
810f10
Core
Haswell
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4030U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2.14k
3.8k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
17.38k (x3.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
5.17k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.01k
3.16k (x1.57)
TOTAL
11.93k
29.52k (x2.48)
Multithread
i3-4030U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.94k
15.28k (x3.88)
Test#2 (FP)
13.68k
76.44k (x5.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
27.48k (x4.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.44k
3.02k (x1.24)
TOTAL
25.84k
122.2k (x4.73)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
13.95k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
20.7k (x3.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
5.33k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
3.03k (x1.42)
TOTAL
17.47k
43.01k (x2.46)
Multithread
i3-4030U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
58.56k (x4.1)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
92.95k (x6.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
28.55k (x4.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
2.98k (x1.2)
TOTAL
36.74k
183.04k (x4.98)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4030U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6.4k
13.04k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
22.35k (x3.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
5.37k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
3.4k (x1.66)
TOTAL
17.15k
44.15k (x2.58)
Multithread
i3-4030U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
56.49k (x4.39)
Test#2 (FP)
15.12k
100.74k (x6.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
28.21k (x4.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.15k
3.04k (x1.42)
TOTAL
35.88k
188.49k (x5.25)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
14.2k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
23.23k (x3.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
5.35k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
5.18k (x2.32)
TOTAL
21.57k
47.96k (x2.22)
Multithread
i3-4030U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
58.24k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
105.72k (x6.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
28.73k (x4.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
5.59k (x2.28)
TOTAL
46.09k
198.27k (x4.3)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4