| | | | | | |

Core i3-2330M vs i5-9500T


Description
The i3-2330M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2330M gets a score of 33.3 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 6.4 times faster than the i3-2330M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
906ea
Core
Sandy Bridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
9216 kB
Date
June 2011
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.02k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.28k points
274.02k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2330M
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.61k
13.46k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
5.42k
20.21k (x3.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.45k
4.72k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
10.25k (x4.05)
TOTAL
16.02k
48.64k (x3.04)

Multithread

i3-2330M

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.99k
74.65k (x6.23)
Test#2 (FP)
11.42k
110.86k (x9.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
22.08k (x3.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
4.12k (x1.01)
TOTAL
33.28k
211.7k (x6.36)

Performance/W
i3-2330M
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
343 points/W
2133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
326 points/W
3167 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
631 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
951 points/W
6049 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-2330M
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2551 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2465 points/GHz
5462 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
2771 points/GHz
TOTAL
7281 points/GHz
13145 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4