| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-9700K


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-9700K gets 396.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.7 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2018

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
24572 (1.08%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
21474 (-3.04%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
5094 (-0.94%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
10930 (29.22%)
TOTAL
60056
62070 (3.35%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
186771 (84.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
162413 (65.66%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
36336 (49.65%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
10807 (179.75%)
TOTAL
227670
396327 (74.08%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1966 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
382 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
4172 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5015 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
4383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2231 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12667 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9