Core i3-10100T vs i7-9700K
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
73.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
460.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
29.3k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
25.61k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.86k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
12.86k (x1.52)
TOTAL
60.06k
73.62k (x1.23)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
217.77k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
190.46k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
40.48k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
11.31k (x2.93)
TOTAL
227.67k
460.02k (x2.02)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2005 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
426 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
4842 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5226 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15025 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4