| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-4770


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4770 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-4770 gets 184 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
45.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
184k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
13.62k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
12.55k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.17k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
4.67k (x0.57)
TOTAL
48.19k
36k (x0.75)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
56.17k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
59.54k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
23.91k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
8.21k (x2.13)
TOTAL
175.24k
147.82k (x0.84)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
23.02k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
11.89k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.29k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
4.98k (x0.59)
TOTAL
60.06k
45.19k (x0.75)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
94.23k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
59.02k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
25.06k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
5.69k (x1.47)
TOTAL
227.67k
184k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1122 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
703 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
2191 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5902 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
11586 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4