| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Engineering Sample 506E8


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.1 times faster than the 506E8. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
506e8
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
Jun 2016

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
23913 (-1.63%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
21030 (-5.04%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
5047 (-1.84%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
6398 (-24.36%)
TOTAL
60056
56388 (-6.11%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
95296 (-6.10%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
91944 (-6.22%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
22055 (-9.17%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
2301 (-40.44%)
TOTAL
227670
211596 (-7.06%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
INF points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
INF points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
INF points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
INF points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
INF points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6463 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5684 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1729 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15240 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9