| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
13951 (0.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
22024 (5.20%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
5167 (-0.17%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
16611 (102.53%)
TOTAL
48194
57753 (19.83%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
120586 (119.74%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
197339 (111.80%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
56829 (143.51%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
6405 (66.18%)
TOTAL
175244
381159 (117.50%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
844 points/W
1855 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1433 points/W
3036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
2696 points/W
5864 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3228 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4869 points/GHz
5952 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1907 points/GHz
4490 points/GHz
TOTAL
11208 points/GHz
15609 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9