| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2017

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
3953 (-8.60%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
18364 (17.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
5391 (7.05%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
17352 (126.00%)
TOTAL
32734
45059 (37.65%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
19466 (17.36%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
77188 (8.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
15398 (-33.81%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
12252 (217.30%)
TOTAL
114806
124304 (8.27%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
14634 (-39.80%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
24086 (8.76%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
5510 (7.16%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
15862 (87.53%)
TOTAL
60056
60093 (0.06%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
48750 (-51.96%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
80100 (-18.30%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
24499 (0.90%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
19853 (413.92%)
TOTAL
227670
173202 (-23.92%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9