| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium G850


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the G850 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the G850 gets 40.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.5 times faster than the G850 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
206a7
Core
Gemini Lake
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
May 2012

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
G850
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
8771 (79.16%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
7077 (-2.46%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
3720 (35.04%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
2282 (-31.21%)
TOTAL
18223
21850 (19.90%)

Multithread

J4105

G850
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
17499 (-7.13%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
13482 (-50.88%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
7320 (-29.30%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2195 (-54.78%)
TOTAL
61495
40496 (-34.15%)

Performance/W
J4105
G850
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
269 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
207 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
34 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
623 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
G850
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2440 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
787 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
7534 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8