| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i3-4030U


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i3-4030U gets 36.7 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.7 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
40651
Core
Gemini Lake
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2014

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2145 (27.47%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
5396 (1.99%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2370 (-13.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
2015 (-41.50%)
TOTAL
13165
11925 (-9.42%)

Multithread

J4105

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
3940 (-38.36%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
13676 (-31.68%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
5781 (-43.45%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
2439 (-50.65%)
TOTAL
41572
25836 (-37.85%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
6698 (36.82%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
5985 (-17.51%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2651 (-3.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
2133 (-35.72%)
TOTAL
18223
17467 (-4.15%)

Multithread

J4105

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
14300 (-24.11%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
13830 (-49.61%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
6124 (-40.85%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2484 (-48.82%)
TOTAL
61495
36738 (-40.26%)

Performance/W
J4105
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
953 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
922 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
408 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
2449 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3525 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
3150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1395 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8