| | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the E2200 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 32.3 k points while the E2200 gets 15.4 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is 2.1 times faster than the E2200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
6fd
Core
Braswell
Allendale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
March 2015
December 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
1073
2215 (106.48%)
Test#2 (FP)
1739
2215 (27.38%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1503
2216 (47.39%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1460
1169 (-19.98%)
TOTAL
5776
7815 (35.31%)

Multithread

N3150

E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
3985
4409 (10.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
6310
4420 (-29.96%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5050
4445 (-11.98%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2653
1181 (-55.49%)
TOTAL
17999
14455 (-19.69%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
3904
2527 (-35.29%)
Test#2 (FP)
2291
2297 (0.24%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579
2306 (46.08%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1465
1165 (-20.49%)
TOTAL
9239
8294 (-10.23%)

Multithread

N3150

E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
14886
5060 (-66.01%)
Test#2 (FP)
8727
4582 (-47.50%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5922
4614 (-22.08%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2745
1181 (-56.99%)
TOTAL
32280
15436 (-52.18%)

Performance/W
N3150
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
2481 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1455 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
5380 points/W
237 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
1877 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
759 points/GHz
1048 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
529 points/GHz
TOTAL
4442 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8