Celeron G1610T vs Pentium G850
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the G850 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the G850 gets 40.5 k points.
Summarizing, the G850 is 1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the G850 gets 40.5 k points.
Summarizing, the G850 is 1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2012
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
21.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
40.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
G850
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
8.77k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
7.08k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
3.72k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.28k (x0.82)
TOTAL
20.84k
21.85k (x1.05)
Multithread
G1610T
G850
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
17.5k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
13.48k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
7.32k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.19k (x0.63)
TOTAL
38.59k
40.5k (x1.05)
Performance/W
G1610T
G850
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
269 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
207 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
34 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
623 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
G850
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
2440 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
787 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
7534 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4