Xeon w3-2423 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.3 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the w3-2423 gets a score of 254.3 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.3 times faster than the w3-2423. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806f8
800f11
Core
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 4677
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2023
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
46.97k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.28k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
21.46k
12.65k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
12.28k
20.95k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
4.63k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.9k
14.47k (x2.1)
TOTAL
46.97k
52.69k (x1.12)
Multithread
w3-2423
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
97.83k
101.78k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
100.83k
177.57k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.56k
47.18k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.06k
6.78k (x0.75)
TOTAL
254.28k
333.31k (x1.31)
Performance/W
w3-2423
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
815 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
840 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
2119 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
w3-2423
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5109 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2923 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1507 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1643 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
11183 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4