| | | | | | |

Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 494.4 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 2.9 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
81.96k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
494.38k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.97k
3.95k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
17.98k
18.36k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.89k
5.39k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.49k
17.35k (x1.2)
TOTAL
43.32k
45.06k (x1.04)

Multithread

i7-9700K

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
37.81k
19.47k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
138.05k
77.19k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.78k
15.4k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.13k
12.25k (x1.72)
TOTAL
224.77k
124.3k (x0.55)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
32.45k
14.63k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
28.3k
24.09k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.27k
5.51k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.93k
15.86k (x1.06)
TOTAL
81.96k
60.09k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-9700K

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
244.31k
48.75k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
199.72k
80.1k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.15k
24.5k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
19.85k (x2.76)
TOTAL
494.38k
173.2k (x0.35)

Performance/W
i7-9700K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2572 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2102 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
454 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
5204 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6623 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5776 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3047 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16726 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4