| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i9-9900K


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.3 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
906ec
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
5.17k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
21.15k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
7.01k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
15.32k (x1.31)
TOTAL
48.01k
48.66k (x1.01)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
38.45k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
155.68k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
51k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
18.26k (x1.22)
TOTAL
354.57k
263.38k (x0.74)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
33.62k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
30.02k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
7.17k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
15.43k (x1.31)
TOTAL
81.62k
86.24k (x1.06)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
248.93k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
224.43k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
53.39k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
18.54k (x0.92)
TOTAL
709.85k
545.3k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4