| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X vs Core i9-9900K


Description
The 7950X is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.9 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
906ec
Core
Raphael
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
170 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2022
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
7950X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6.05k
5.17k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
23.41k
21.15k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.49k
7.01k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.35k
15.32k (x0.45)
TOTAL
80.3k
48.66k (x0.61)

Multithread

7950X

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
128.82k
38.45k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
465.79k
155.68k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289.43k
51k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
75.23k
18.26k (x0.24)
TOTAL
959.27k
263.38k (x0.27)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
40.61k
33.62k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
31.82k
30.02k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.63k
7.17k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.28k
15.43k (x0.48)
TOTAL
121.33k
86.24k (x0.71)

Multithread

7950X

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
683.17k
248.93k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
563.45k
224.43k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
286.77k
53.39k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.4k
18.54k (x0.29)
TOTAL
1597.79k
545.3k (x0.34)

Performance/W
7950X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4019 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3314 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
379 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
9399 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7124 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5582 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2917 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5663 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
21286 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4