| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-9900K


Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 749.9 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.4 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ec
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
72.68k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
749.89k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.46k
5.17k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
21.15k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
7.01k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.71k
15.32k (x0.65)
TOTAL
54.68k
48.66k (x0.89)

Multithread

3900X

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
52.65k
38.45k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
265.41k
155.68k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.78k
51k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
46.91k
18.26k (x0.39)
TOTAL
505.76k
263.38k (x0.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.72k
33.62k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
30.02k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
7.17k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.27k
15.43k (x0.69)
TOTAL
72.68k
86.24k (x1.19)

Multithread

3900X

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
247.99k
248.93k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
308.7k
224.43k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
139.43k
53.39k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
53.77k
18.54k (x0.34)
TOTAL
749.89k
545.3k (x0.73)

Performance/W
3900X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2362 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2940 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1328 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
512 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
7142 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3636 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1904 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4842 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
15799 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4