| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i9-9900K


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 1 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906ec
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2020
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
89.53k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.41k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
5.17k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.57k
21.15k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.22k
7.01k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.62k
15.32k (x0.54)
TOTAL
66.39k
48.66k (x0.73)

Multithread

5800X

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
35.09k
38.45k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
171.84k
155.68k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.67k
51k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.83k
18.26k (x1.69)
TOTAL
325.43k
263.38k (x0.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
33.62k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
26.46k
30.02k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.18k
7.17k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.58k
15.43k (x0.58)
TOTAL
89.53k
86.24k (x0.96)

Multithread

5800X

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
187.4k
248.93k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
246.12k
224.43k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.16k
53.39k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
18.54k (x1.58)
TOTAL
558.41k
545.3k (x0.98)

Performance/W
5800X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1785 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2344 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1078 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5170 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5631 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5656 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
19049 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4